Breaking News

U.S. Court Concludes Israel’s Assault on Gaza Is Plausible Case of Genocide

January 31, 2024, Oakland CA

While Dismissing Case on Jurisdictional Grounds, U.S. Federal Judge “Implores” the Biden Administration to Stop its “Unflagging Support” for Israel’s Ongoing Siege of the Palestinian People in Gaza!

Source: Center For Constitutional Rights

Transformation of pre-1948 Palestine to it’s status as of 2010. The squatters have taken over! Image credit: Reddit,


Who is a “squatter”? A squatter is someone who unlawfully occupies someone else’s land or home without permission or legal title. In the case of Israel, the definition can be expanded to include the designation “settler”. The indigenous to the American continent are painfully aware of who squatters or settlers are.

The 1917 Balfour Declaration addressed to Lord Bauer (ancestrally renamed to Rothschild by Meyer Amschel Bauer in 1760) by British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour. See “Side Note” below.

In 1917, Lord Balfour, the British Foreign Secretary, in a communique to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain, proposed the parcel of land from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea (“from the river to the sea”) as a new “Settlement” for the world’s wandering Jews who, at that point, had no homeland.

The question begs asking: since when does someone’s Religion (Judaism is a religion, not a race or ethnic class) entitle them to their own land? It doesn’t in a secular world (the world we live in).

If one uses a 4000-year old biblical text as justification, then everyone who doesn’t profess to be a Jew has a claim to a parcel of land according to their religion. Christians, I suppose, could claim the Vatican as their parcel of land since Christianity was synonymous with Catholicism up until King Henry VIII’s break with Rome or Martin Luther’s. No matter; what of the world’s Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Pagans, Pantheists, Agnostics, Atheists, Anarchists, etc.? Should they be entitled to a piece of land according to their religion or lack thereof?

The whole idea is absurd on its face.

But this is what was proposed by Arthur Balfour in 1917 and what came to fruition in 1948 when the United Nations decreed that the Jews who had wandered the globe for centuries could now legally squat on someone else’s land, “from the river to the sea”. The only requirement was that they be Jewish. How many converted to Judaism just to claim a piece of someone else’s land for themselves? We’ll never know. This isn’t being anti-Semitic. It’s simply stating the obvious. This claim that defending the position of the Palestinians is anti-Semitic is another absurdity. The Palestinians are also Semitic!

In a just world, the rules apply equally to all, right? Apparently not, since the Palestinians are being eviscerated as I write this. Why? Because they were born Palestinian in Gaza or the West Bank or anywhere else “from the river to the sea” where settlers from Brooklyn, Seattle, Atlanta, Manhattan, Hartford, Bangor, Moscow, Berlin, Warsaw, London or from anywhere else, want to settle. By the time I complete the next sentence about 10 Palestinians will have been murdered by some Israeli(s).

The claim is made ad nauseum by the US Government and most western governments that “Israel has the right to defend itself”. In any moral universe, they actually don’t. Picture the following scenario:

A wandering vagrant, seeking refuge on a cold winter’s night, enters a newly abandoned home, abandoned so he thought. Seeing that the rightful owner hasn’t returned by sunrise, the vagrant remains, staying another day and night. There was food in the pantry so he didn’t need to leave the property in search of something to eat.

Two weeks later, the rightful owner returns from vacation only to find this vagrant occupying his home, sleeping in his bed and having consumed most of the food in the pantry. Outraged by the intrusion, the vagrant assaults the intruder, causing him to run and call the police. When the police arrive, they attempt to evict the vagrant at which point the vagrant takes out his firearm and starts shooting at the police. Outnumbered and outgunned, the vagrant eventually surrenders and is placed under arrest.

What was his crime? Squatting.

Not to mention the illegal settlements on the West Bank and greater, occupied Palestine, replace the vagrant with the Jewish settlers who have made their permanent homes on land that, up until 1948, belonged to someone else.

Who ratified this illegal appropriation and occupation of Palestinian land?

The United Nations.

The whole world watched while 700,000 Palestinians were forcibly evicted from their homes and land.

Why did this happen?

Because the United Nations is simply another foreign-policy arm of the US/UK, a marriage made in Hell. The lie that this transfer of territory to squatters from around the globe was somehow lawful has been repeated, over and over again, since 1948, to the point that it has now become normalized. Everyone buys into this bullshit!

The 1948 decree included “The Right of Return”. When is this right enforceable and by who? Now, in 10 years, a century, by the very same organization who orchestrated it in the first place? When? When the squatters decide it’s time to do the right thing and let the rightful owners return and have their land back? We all know that will never happen. Who will enforce it and how? To enforce the Palestinian’s Right of Return, any agency, government or group would have to go up against the Israeli Army. It’s clear then, the “Right of Return” was included only as an appeasement without intent.

What was done to the Palestinians in 1948, 700,000 of them, was an open crime in front of the whole world. And now the US Government and most other Western governments claim Israel has the right to defend themselves! The Squatters have the right to defend themselves against the rightful owners who were forcibly evicted and displaced by UN Decree! No, they don’t!

Getting back to the scenario above, picture the wandering vagrant killing the owner with a knife or his gun when he was surprised upon the owner’s return. Picture the police declaring that the vagrant “has the right to defend himself” and you have a good idea of what the Palestinian-Israeli “conflict” is all about.


It was the year 740, in a region of western Asia between the Black and Caspian Seas, a region now occupied by the modern country of Georgia. Surrounded on one side by Muslims and the other by Christians, were the indigenous of the region. Their ruler, King Bulan of Khazaria, vigilant and caring for his people, was concerned they would become victims of a zealous cleric, either Muslim or Christian. His people were pantheists, pagans, atheists, Gypsies and wanderers, all with habits, religions and lifestyles markedly different from their neighbors on both sides.

He convinced his people to convert to Judaism, the last remaining of the three major world regions so as not to antagonize their neighbors with their diverse ways and strange religions or lack thereof. You see, it was the time of conquests, upheavals, rampant superstition, with the stage set for the first Crusades. The age of reason hadn’t dawned yet and many, even seemingly smart people, were governed by superstition, ignorance and pseudoscience.

The Khazars became really good at what they did. They became influencers and master manipulators, traits that would ultimately serve them well in the coming centuries, traits that would also cause them to be reviled most everywhere they went. Their decedents would become the modern Zionists, the settler-colonialists that today claim the region between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea as their home, Israel. The actual Kingdom of Israel and Judah ended in the year 722 BC with the defeat of both kingdoms, Judah in the south and Israel in the north. There was an uneasy co-existence after they split until the ultimate destruction of the Kingdom of Israel by Assyria in 722/721 BC.

There are some Orthodox Jews, the Hasidim, who call Israel home. They denounce the government and state of Israel and claim the policies of Benjamin Netanyahu and his government are diametrically opposed to the teachings of the Talmud. The modern state of Israel is founded on a myth, that it is the “will of God”, as referenced in the Bible, that this parcel of land, between “the River and the Sea”, should be the home of the Jewish people. What Jews, the biblical Jews of the Kingdom of Israel and Judah, who ceased to exist as a “Kingdom” or “People” in 722 BC or the modern Khazars, the wanderers who left that region of western Asia, who became master manipulators and influencers, corrupt businessmen, bankers and money launderers? The former, a completely different race, speak Hebrew, the later, Yiddish, the language of the Khazars.

You see, Judaism is a religion, not a race. Where is the parcel of land for the Christians (the Vatican?) or the Muslims? Why should these modern barbarians, at the expense of the lives, blood and treasure of a completely different race of people, the Palestinians, impose such a brutal price on them, one of the kindest, most well-educated and refined people on the planet? As they did with the simmering pot of water in the north of Ireland, that the British started this mess in 1917 goes without saying.

They, the British, have been at it for over a 1000 years. They’ve had a lot of practice, stealing other peoples’ land, settling it at the barrel of a gun, the tip of a spear or the blade of a sword. Arthur Balfour’s declaration was illegal. He (and the British crown) did not have legal title to the land “from the River to the Sea”. The whole “State of Israel” is a land grab disguised as a biblical mandate. Balfour had no legal title to the land he bequeathed to the modern descendants of the ancient Khazars, the Ashkenazi Jews, the majority of those squatting on someone else’s land in a place that is now called “Israel”.

Many Zionists, settler-colonialists, who claim the State of Israel as their world and their home, claim theirs is a righteous cause, that they forcibly evict the rightful inhabitants of the land, the Palestinians, as a mandate from God (who could argue with that – after all God wins all arguments, right?) What mortal could challenge the will and decree of the Almighty? Sound familiar?

The Jews of the Bible, the ancient people who claim Abraham as their Patriarch, are not these Zionists who have bamboozled the world into believing they are the rightful owners of this land, after all, who could argue with a Divine mandate?

A worthy endeavor would be to run DNA tests on these people and determine their genetic lineage. It would be a reasonable wager that many results would link back to that region of western Asia between the Black and Caspian seas, not to the land of Judah. Well, as it turns out, someone has done that. Eran Elhaik of Johns Hopkins University has published a study that supports the Khazarian migration account as described above. Quoting from the abstract:

Recent sequencing of modern Caucasus populations prompted us to revisit the Khazarian hypothesis and compare it with the Rhineland hypothesis. We applied a wide range of population genetic analyses to compare these two hypotheses. Our findings support the Khazarian hypothesis and portray the European Jewish genome as a mosaic of Near Eastern-Caucasus, European, and Semitic ancestries, thereby consolidating previous contradictory reports of Jewish ancestry. We further describe a major difference among Caucasus populations explained by the early presence of Judeans in the Southern and Central Caucasus.

Side Note
In 1760, Meyer Amschel Bauer legally changed his name to Meyer Amschel Rothschild based on the following account.

1744: On February 23rd, Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, is born in Frankfurt, Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a money lender and proprietor of a counting house.

Moses places a red sign above the entrance to his counting house. This sign is a red hexagram which, under Rothschild’s instruction, will end up on the Israeli flag 200 years later, often referred to as “The Star of David”.

Recognizing the significance of the Red Hexagram hanging over the entrance to his counting house, Meyer Amschel Bauer  changes his name from Bauer to Rothschild, after the red hexagram. “Rot” is German for “Red” and “Schild” is German for “Shield” or “Sign”.

It’s not surprising that every “Prime Minister” of Israel since its creation out of the Negev desert of Palestine has been an Ashkenazi Jew.

It’s been said that the sun never set on the British Empire. Indeed it didn’t. As they did for the Rothschild’s in the 19th century, the British government continues their servitude and protection for this worldwide banking cabal into the 20th century and now, the 21st century. First, with the Balfour Declaration of 1917 and then in 1948 when the State of Israel was created out of whole cloth with land stolen from poor people without any money or power.

Additional Sources,the%20Rhineland%20in%20western%20Germany

Total Page Visits: 210 - Today Page Visits: 1